Niels Visker vs Benoit Torcq Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Aug at 12:44 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Visker vs B. Torcq

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Visker 1 - 0 Torcq
They have played 2 sets in total, with Niels Visker winning 2 and Benoit Torcq winning 0. The last match between Niels Visker and Benoit Torcq was at the M15 Eupen, 07-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Niels Visker getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Visker | 1 |
| Torcq | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Eupen(08-07-25)
N. Visker vs B. Torcq H2H Profile
N. Visker vs B. Torcq Match Preview:
- How do they fare on their second serve? Recently, Visker has a slight edge with 47.65% of success compared to Torcq's 44.58%.
- Return game strength? Torcq shines on first serve returns, winning 35.15% of points, far surpassing Visker’s 25.52%.
- Who's better under pressure? Visker saves breakpoints more effectively, with a 58.46% success rate against Torcq's 43.33%.
- Overall match performance over the past year shows both players are closely matched, with Torcq winning 53.85% and Visker 53.03% of their matches.
- Who's stronger on different surfaces? Torcq excels on clay, while Visker has the advantage on hard courts.
- Level of competition faced? Torcq has competed against higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 87.29, compared to Visker's 389.7.
- When it comes to deciding set outcomes, Visker has the upper hand, winning 52% of such matches versus Torcq’s 47%.
- Break point opportunities reveal Torcq's conversion rate of 37.74% is higher than Visker's 33%, a strong indicator in close matches.
- Both players primarily played at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournament level, but Visker has a slightly better win percentage.
Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming match, several key statistics provide insights into the potential outcomes. Torcq displays superior ability in winning return points, particularly turning first serves back into play, which could be a pivotal factor.
Visker, meanwhile, shows commendable skill in holding ground under pressure, notably excelling at saving breakpoints. This ability might serve him well in crucial moments during the match.
Despite their similarly aligned overall past performance figures, Torcq has faced higher-ranked opponents over the past year, suggesting he may be better prepared for tougher matches.
Given Torcq’s ability to perform stronger return games and compete against higher-caliber opponents, he is slightly favored to win this matchup, though Visker's resilience cannot be underestimated.
Niels Visker vs Benoit Torcq Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Visker vs B. Torcq H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:56:13 | Average Match Time | 0:56:13 |
| 54% (19/35) | 1st Serve % | 73% (29/40) |
| 89% (17/19) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (19/29) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (17/40) | Return Points Win % | 23% (8/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Visker Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 7-6(8) | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
B. Torcq Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | ||

N. Visker vs B. Torcq Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.00% (171/114) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.33% (58/55) |
| 58.51% (385/273) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.58% (130/127) |
| 52.57% (3414/3080) | Games Win/Loss | 50.71% (1316/1279) |
| 64.37% (56/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (18/18) |
| 57.76% (93/68) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.63% (40/36) |
| 59.46% (22/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1287 | Aces Total | 37 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 595 | Total Double Faults | 89 |
| 1:19:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 400.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 133.79 |
| 62% (10142/16284) | 1st Serve % | 65% (1639/2518) |
| 71% (7209/10142) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (987/1639) |
| 51% (3129/6141) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (400/879) |
| 41% (577/1414) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (100/276) |
| 38% (6093/16177) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1003/2549) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.17% (12/11) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.92% (159/102) | Futures W/L | 51.33% (58/55) |
| 60% (167/280) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (57/112) |
| 61% (56/92) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (9/19) |
| 49% (46/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 84% (174/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (57/47) |
| 16% (174/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (57/10) |
| 22% (111/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (56/11) |